Friday, July 24, 2009

Sunwest investors angered by $24 million in legal bills

Lawyers and other professionals in the Sunwest Management legal brawl have racked up a $24 million tab in the past year, a sum that could soar to $90 million in the next 12 months.
That was the eye-popping prediction by the business consultant now running Sunwest, the Salem-based operator of senior housing facilities accused of fraud by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

News of the legal fees has generated howls of protest from some Sunwest investors, who fear that the odds of recovering the nearly $400 million they poured into the company decline with each additional dollar paid to litigate.

More importantly, it puts additional financial pressure on Sunwest, which is responsible for the housing, care and feeding of thousands of elderly and vulnerable residents of their retirement communities.

The company has routinely failed to pay its bills.

"After 18 months to two years of this level of professional fees, I'm just afraid that nothing is going to be left," said Gary Grenley, a Portland attorney representing some investors.
Clyde Hamstreet, the Portland consultant appointed last fall to lead Sunwest, said his $90 million prediction is a worst-case scenario.

"If we want to continue to fight and screw around, this is what it is going to cost us," he said. "It's a big number. It's not a necessary number. I'm optimistic that we could bring it in for 40 percent of that. There's a lot of pressure from the judges to get things moving."

In fairness to the lawyers, the case is hugely complex, involving hundreds of Sunwest affiliate companies, multiple state and federal agencies, an estimated 2,000 investors and 115 lenders owed $2 billion.

But Lynn LoPucki, a professor at the UCLA School of Law who has studied legal costs of corporate bankruptcies, said $90 million is "very high" for a company the size of Sunwest.
"That's 5 percent of the total assets," LoPucki said. "It should be closer to 1 to 2 percent."
The company's legal woes began last spring when the tightening credit market plunged Sunwest into a cash-flow crisis. Sunwest began to put individual retirement facilities, each owned by a separate company, into bankruptcy to fend off lenders' foreclosure efforts.

Sunwest affiliates stopped making promised monthly interest payments to investors last summer, which drew a number of lawsuits. In December, Sunwest's controversial CEO Jon Harder resigned and filed personal Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The SEC entered the fray March 2, accusing Sunwest and Harder of defrauding investors.
At each step, more lawyers got involved.

Looming in the background is the specter of criminal charges against Sunwest executives. Some have hired civil and criminal defense lawyers.

The company and individual executives have hired 31 law firms so far. Sunwest's professional fees topped $2 million in March alone and have averaged nearly $1.8 million the past four months.

Even the company's 115 lenders can incorporate their legal costs into the debt they're owed by Sunwest affiliates, though it's unclear to what extent the court will allow the banks to do so.
Hamstreet's job at this point is to stabilize Sunwest and prevent it from disintegrating under the pressure of the legal battle. He is developing a plan to sell the poorer-performing assisted-living facilities and keep hold of the stronger operations.

Hamstreet is convinced that if he's given sufficient time to stabilize the company, he could generate $400 million to $600 million more than in a fire-sale liquidation.
The SEC and court-appointed receiver Michael Grassmueck back Hamstreet, as does a key committee of investors to which Hamstreet reports. They say Hamstreet's plan has merit and is the most fair to the investors.

But many aren't convinced.
Some lenders simply want to foreclose on the properties put up as collateral for their loans. Sunwest lawyers, with the help of the SEC, have managed to keep the lenders at bay.
"In order for the company to survive, the reorganization plan needs time," said Steve English, a Portland attorney representing Harder. "Some of the lenders were unwilling to give us that time. That's why we sought protection from the court."

The investors are split. Some back Hamstreet. But others, particularly those who put money in the more profitable assisted-living centers, are pushing to take control of their facilities and leave Sunwest behind.
"The only hope for most of these senior living facilities is to allow those that can to escape the quicksand engulfing this organization," Grenley said in an April 20 brief.

Fueling the general discontent is what Grenley called "sweetheart deals" Hamstreet cut with Harder and the other two senior executives at Sunwest, Darryl Fisher and J. Wallace Gutzler.
Hamstreet has agreed to pay monthly allowances of $22,000 to Harder, $10,000 to Fisher and $5,000 to Gutzler. That's in addition to the salaries Sunwest continues to pay to Fisher, Gutzler and Harder's wife, plus their legal fees.

The SEC objected to the Harder deal last month, noting that one reason it sued Sunwest and Harder in March was after learning of an earlier agreement to pay Harder $54,000 a month.
"It is particularly galling that Harder has secured an agreement for these payments when investors -- the victims of his fraud -- saw their payments of monthly rent owed to them stop in July 2008," the SEC said.

Some investors have wondered why Harder remains involved in any capacity. But Mark Fickes, the SEC's lead attorney in the case, said Harder's unique knowledge of the complex Sunwest structure gives him an ongoing role.
"Unlike a pure Ponzi scheme, Sunwest is a legitimate business," Fickes said. "I don't think it started out as a fraud. I think that's what it became as money got tight."
Lawyers investigate lawyers

While Sunwest Management's collapse has been a gravy train for some law firms, it might be a problem for others.

Court-appointed receiver Michael Grassmueck has requested copies of documents from four law firms in Portland that did legal work for Sunwest, what he says is the first step in analyzing potential legal claims.

The firm drawing the most attention is Davis Wright Tremaine, which worked with Sunwest preparing offering memoranda and other documents used to raise nearly $400 million from about 2,000 investors. The receiver also requested files from KL Gates, Thompson & Knight and Lane Powell.

Pursuing claims against professional firms connected to a company accused of improper activity is a well-trod path for victims of failed investment schemes. Tapping into professional firms' liability insurance is often one of the few ways to recover money.

"The firm believes that it advised its clients appropriately," said Joe Arellano, a Portland attorney representing Davis Wright. "What we're seeing is the inevitable rounding up of all the usual suspects, to try to get a large pot for recovery."

Grassmueck has hired forensic accountants to analyze Sunwest's files and its relationships with third-party brokers, lenders, broker-dealers and others.

Sunwest continued to raise money from investors as late as June 2008 and failed to disclose the depths of its financial problems, allege investors, who stopped getting promised monthly interest payments from Sunwest in July.

Davis Wright has been sued twice by Sunwest investors. A similar suit has been filed against KL Gates.

Grassmueck said in his first interim report that Davis Wright has been "dilatory and creative in erecting hurdles to the receiver's access to client files." Where other firms have voluntarily produced files, Davis Wright said it needed clarification from the court before it would do so. The firm also said it would charge the receiver $250,000 in copying fees, Grassmueck said.

-- Jeff Manning; jmanning@news.oregonian.com


r
Check Out www.ObsidianFinanceSucks.com for more on the Oregon Bankruptcy Courts.
r

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Have You or anyone You Know been affected by the Summit 1031 Exchange Bankruptcy?

If so it is Time for You To be in the Loop
On What is Really Going on
With YOUR Money.
o
Find Out More about What is Really happening
with your Money at the Following Websites.
r
Everyday YOU ARE losing Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars.
h
h
www.ObsidianFinanceSucks.com
h
www.Summit1031BKjustice.com

There is way more to the Summit 1031 Bankruptcy
then the Media will Have you Believe
.
f
f

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Realtor becomes Squatter - Realtor has Squatters Rights in Florida Apparently and NAR, they Don't Care.

A story of Squatter Rights in Florida.

Squatters rights sound sick indeed, I guess every state is different. In Montana I had this happen and the local judge said to post a 24 hour notice, and then you could go in after that with a cop to take possession.

I know there are laws about living on a property Adversely where you can somehow file title after 5 years. Sick but true.

However, today we have a story from Florida where a Realtor has changed the locks of a Eldery man's home, and she is living in the home. She claims squatters rights, has moved in others and has big dogs.

This is a Perfect example of NAR standards, now how does a Non-Realtor file an Ethics Complaint against a Realtor, well they don't really. Who helps Real Estate Consumers in situations such as this? Well I am use to NAR, and the local Realtor Associations doing Nothing. We are about to find out if Florida Senior Advocates, Elder Abuse Advocates, Florida Real Estate Regulators, NAR, Florida Association of Realtors or anyone Really will help these folks to GET this Realtor out of this home.

Squatters Rights, Really? Does NAR Condone Such Behavior. Apparently they Do.

Does the National Association of Realtors even really care what their members are doing all day everyday that are directly opposite of their so Called Higher Standards and Play Pretend Pinky Swear Ethics?

Below is the Story Sent to Me today, we will be adding more to this story as we EXPOSE all involved, Stay Tuned our our Realtor Whistleblower Network.

HERE is the STORY as Sent to ME

I found out today that I have a dear friend in trouble (Marge)- the woman volunteers for The Society of St. Vincent DePaul (our mission is to provide all kinds of help to those in real need), she is retired and a good friend of my family.My mother and she are neighbors in a gated community in Naples, Florida. Long story short - they are neighbors of a man who was diagnosed with stage 4 bone cancer.

He is British and wanted to return to England to live out what time he has left. He hired a realtor from Downing Frye to sell his home.

The realtor allegedly asked the owner if she could Live in the house while she showed it???? He supposedly said yes. She has no lease- she pays no rent.

She apparently neglected to tell him that she was bringing along at least two other people and three large dogs. Marge and other neighbors called the owner - who asked the realtor to leave.

She promptly told them that she has squatter's rights and needs notice. When the squatters rights for Florida scenarios was checked out - they found out that she was right and could be in the house anywhere from 3 mos. to a year and has to be served official papers and given ample time to be evicted.

Apparently this past weekend - Marge and another neighbor found out that this realtor had changed all of the locks on the premises and rearranged all of the furniture and the house. They informed the owner.

He asked Marge and Nancy to please change the locks (he is still in England with bone cancer)They saw that a back window was open - (they both had original keys to the house since they had cared for it before) .

They called the locksmith and had the locks changed.

The squatter/realtor comes home. Calls the police - tells police that someone broke into the house and stole valuable items including all of her jewelry. One cop sided with Marge and Nancy - the other with said realtor.

She is pressing charges for breaking and entering and theft. Nancy and Marge are each meeting with attorneys tomorrow.

Marge is 74, a wonderful person, and very upset.

Are there not rules against realtors becoming squatters? Is that not a conflict of interest? What would give her any incentive to sell the house at all? Paying no rent, very nice home, gated community with a beautiful clubhouse and other amenities? Is that not ground to lose a license?

I know there are squatters and the situation is getting worse because of all of the vacant houses - but this woman misrepresented herself - she said she was a realtor (and is)but took advantage of a client and under false pretenses - who is suffering through the last of his life with a very painful disease.

Real Estate Victims Stories


Crystal L. Cox
Real Estate Whistleblower
www.RealEstateIndustryWhistleblower.com
Elder Abuse Specialist
Self Appointed

Stay Tuned for the Names of ALL who are a Party to this Blatant attack on YOUR Civil Rights, real estate rights and your life, brought to you by NAR.

Elder Abuse Florida
Real Estate Consumer Attack Florida
r

Kevin Padrick Demands the Police Get Evidence to Arrest Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung?

This has got to be a joke right. The Oregon Police want EVIDENCE from Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung, and based on Claims by Super Power Attorney Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance?

I knew that Kevin Padrick had connections but WOW..

So what is this Evidence that Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance wants to Collect to STOP Industry Whistleblower Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung?

Stay Tuned for Oregon Criminal Code, Internet Laws, Blogger Cases and More.. but for now here is the Evidence that Kevin Padrick Demands from Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung so that he can, well press charges... and all..

Well Here it is....

The pieces of evidence are…

The entire video
The audio of the hearing where the judge instructs to have the presentation.

The pictures of the video equipment from
where Kevin, Ewan Rose and Ryan Norwood were seated.

The email sent reporting
the concerns and suggestions from that presentation.

They are going to the conference room to take a look at it. Certainly they will find the same as the local criminal attorney found – that it is too difficult of case because of my evidence that it was semi-public and the equipment was not concealed.
r
So why Does Kevin Padrick Keep Fighting so Hard? Well because he DOES not want the Real Estate Victims who have Millions Tied up in 1031 Exchanges Bankruptcy to See the Video, to find out the Truth and to Get their money back that he WANTS.. Just My Opinion of Course.
r
More on this Story at...
d
d

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Does Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Really get 16% to Liquidate Assets?

It is Said that "It appears that Kevin Padrick (Obsidian Finance) have done a great sales (snow) job to the creditors and now he is the Trustee. I believe he gets 16% to liquidate all of the assets and 5 years to do it. "

Holy Cow, this is a Serious attack on YOU the Consumers - the Creditors who are hurt in all this. And if Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial get 5 years to do it, then the Consumers tied up in all this are at the Mercy of ONE Man, and he Obviously Values Money and Power Trips over

Yes Summit 1031 Exchangers made a bad real estate investment, many are taking it on the chin during these times, but instead of making it right by the consumers. Kevin Padrick, Trustee, is getting in the Way of Real Justice for Consumers and he talks about "We have a Melting Ice cube" - HE is the one melting it and 5 years of Legal Fees at $600 an hour to liquidate, that is down right consumer fraud in my book. Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial will eat up all of the Money and NO consumer will ever get justice. Not because Summit 1031 made a bad investment and LOST your money.

It is Said that Summit 1031 had the Money to pay you, they had a 10 million bond, millions upon millions in cash, and a million in E and O insurance

Summit 1031 should not have naively invested Real Estate Consumers Money, they made a very poor choice, however, the Trustee, the one tying up the money and assets now and keeping it from given the Real Estate Victims any kind of Relief Seems to be Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial.

With the Money he has already used up since Dec. There will be nothing left by the time he gets around to actual liquidation and getting the Real Estate Victims in all of this ANY kind of Financial Relief.

It is said that "Summit 1031 made some risky choices, and they imploded with the RE market. If he had put the exchange funds in the FDIC guaranteed accounts that he stated he would in his marketing materials, none of this would be happening."

I don't think there is much doubt that Summit 1031 screwed up, but when you get to the point of Justice for the Real Estate Consumers and Greedy Attorneys soak up what the VICTIMS should get , well then more to the story needs told.

These Real Estate Victims, have lost a lot, and FDIC protection or not their still was Asset and Money enough to get these Real Estate Victims some Financial Justice, but Kevin Padrick is making it so they will never see any financial justice.

Kevin Padrick also seems to have odd meeting with the Creditors, and there are rumors of secret deals... and Kevin Padrick playing both sides of this deal. I am sure this is not true, but hey that is what I am hearing. As usual I encourage you to gather information and to think for yourself. Don't believe me, don't believe any ONE source, do your homework Find Out the Truth for Yourself.

I heard the legal fees were already over 1.4 million - More details on that later... However it certainly looks like the attorneys will end up with all the money, why the Bankruptcy Courts and the Department of Justice allows this attack on Real Estate Consumers is beyond me.

There are creditors suing trying to get ahead of other creditors. It is said that Stevens and Neuman of Summit 1031 just want to get the creditors paid but Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial won't allow it to happen.

Kevin Padrick is in a VERY good position and stands to make too much money from the assets of Summit 1031, so he greedily holds everything up while you the Real Estate Consumer (the Creditors) suffer. You lose your liefs work over ONE Man's Intense Greed, and seriously taking advantage of Bankruptcy Laws and abusing his power as a Trustee.. why can't he be FIRED or Removed from this, he is obviously hurting the Consumer and as usual No One cares about the Rights of the Innocent Real Estate Victims out there that have lost millions, lost businesses and ranches and now it is all going to be gone due to greed.

The IRS makes 1031's legal right? But What, they have no Rules, Oversite, Checks and Balances or Procedures in place to protect your Money that is with the exchangers that they Get to Legally invest for the time of your exchange in which they have YOUR money interest free, as set up by the IRS. But the IRS is no where in sight when you lose everything.

Kevin Padrick is said to be turning down offers to settle, this hurts Real Estate Consumers and no one can Make Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial Do the Right thing. Why?

This is a quote from a Forum talking about this, I won't link to the Forum because the F Word is way to out of control over there.. anyway here is the quote,

"It seems Kevin has a new phrase he learned called "PONZI SCHEME" and thinks by using it at court it may gain him some more leverage. I think if someone walked into court with 15 million to pay the creditors, Kevin Padrick would fight it because he wouldn't get his 16%. Google him and see he is the one living the lavish lifestyle and at whose expense? It is just an absolute shame that this has spiraled so far out of control and the only ones profiting from it is the attorneys and Kevin Padrick (obsidian Finance)."

More Food for Thought at the Links Below
l
f
d

Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Finance Presentation and Some Old Fashion EVASION..

http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=254
r
Did Summit 1031 Take the Fall for The Further bad Actions
of Obsidian Financial.
r
Well with Enough information
You the Real Estate Victims
Get to Decide for Yourself.
r
Got to Get you Some More of this Stuff
Click Below for More Videos
Hurry, Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial and
his big bad attorney, David Aman are TRYING to
SILENCE the TRUTH.
R
http://www.youtube.com/user/Summit1031bk
r

David Arman seems to Be Claiming that the Truth is Criminal? Class A Misdemeanor?

I know that Attorneys with anything to Do With Real Estate Consumer Issues like to PUSH the issue of, NOT Disclosing all Pertinent Information to the Real Estate Consumers, Real Estate Victims so that they cannot possibly make an informed decision.
r
You see, Stephanie Studebaker- DeYoung is one smart cookie, she wanted no mistake Ever Being Made that What Was Said at this Presentation was Really Said.
r
She obviously knew that later it would be a case of I did not say that. And how is she suppose to protect her future, her reputation and her father's company, as well as Consumers Rights - banking on Kevin Padrick of Obsidian Financial to tell the truth later about what was said at this meeting. Or that Kevin Padrick would even Remember it, well as it REALLY happened anyway.
r
the Only way to Ensure that the TRUTH was Preserved and that Real Estate Consumers would have access to FULL Disclosure of how this all played out was to RECORD this Closed Door Meeting.
r
Now she recorded it Right there in front of them all. Her Laptop had a Camera, they all do these days, the light was on and the Recording was Blatant and Obvious.
r
Still Kevin Padrick, in all his Arrogance threw his weight around and gave the What For and how is Going to be Speach along with HEY We were on this Right Away SOUND OFF and well he NEVER ever expected a Recording of What he Said.
r
So Stephanie Studebaker-DeYoung put this Recording on her blog, that has TONS of Consumer Valuable information, to update Consumers, Creditors on the Progress of the Summit 1031 Exchangers Bankruptcy and to let the Creditors / Consumers know what was Really Going on behind the Closed Doors of their Real Estate Transaction. That Quite Frankly really does Affect them.
r
Is the Truth Criminal?
r
Is Disclosure Criminal?

r
Well David Arman of Tonkon Torp LLP Seems to Think SO.
r
This Really Happened, this was REALLY said what Could Kevin Padrick / David Aman Possible want to hide? They are quite wordy and pushing VERY hard to SHUT UP the TRUTH.. Why?
R
Well Here is David S. Aman, Partner, Tonkon Torp LLP Email THREAT to Stephanie Studebaker - DeYoung demanding that She Remove her Vidoes of This Meeting
r
***********

Ms. Studebaker:

As you know, I represent Kevin Padrick. It has come to our attention that you have posted a video on http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/ of a meeting involving Kevin Padrick and others. The video posting includes an audio recording of the meeting. You have also posted a transcript made from the audio recording.

Mr. Padrick and the other Obsidian personnel did not consent to being recorded at the meeting nor did they know they were being recorded. As a result, the person responsible for surreptitiously recording the meeting committed a Class A misdemeanor under ORS 165.540(1)(c). Moreover, your subsequent posting of the illegal recording and transcript constitute an additional Class A misdemeanor under ORS 165.540(1)(e).

We request that you take the video posting and transcript off the website immediately. Please confirm by email to me no later than 3 p.m. today that you have done so, and that you will not engage in further criminal conduct with respect to the recording and transcript.

Regards,

David S. Aman
Partner
Tonkon Torp LLP
1600 Pioneer Tower
888 SW Fifth Avenue
Portland , Oregon 97204
direct dial: (503) 802-2053
cell: (503) 810-0850direct
fax: (503) 972-3753
s
****
Obviously Shaking in her Boots, Stephanie Makes a Stand and Does NOT Remove the Videos but instead Makes Noise on behalf of the Consumer and to Get the Truth Told of Who and What is Really Standing in the Way of the Real Estate Consumer Getting Justice.. So Here Comes this WORDY Email
R
Ms. Studebaker-DeYoung:

We have reviewed the June 2, 2009 memorandum from Marc Andersen, which you sent to me by email on July 15, 2009. The memorandum only further confirms that (a) the recording of the February 12 meeting was criminal and (b) your subsequent posting of the recording and transcript was and is criminal as well.

Mr. Andersen made clear in his memorandum that he based his legal conclusion on the background "facts" you provided him. He also made clear that his legal conclusions could not be relied upon if the facts were incorrect. The background facts you provided him were not only grossly incorrect, but were clearly concocted in order to allow you to get the ultimate legal conclusion from him that you wanted. As a result, it is not at all surprising that Mr. Andersen's ultimate legal conclusion was incorrect. We will correct your version of the "facts" below:


Your "Fact" No. 1- False and irrelevant

Your statement that Obsidian made a presentation to the creditors at a recorded, public meeting prior to February 12, 2007 is simply false. If you are referring to the presentation that Mr. Padrick made to the creditors committee, that was not at a public meeting. And it was not recorded. If you are referring to the Section 341(a) meeting with creditors as provided under the bankruptcy code (which was recorded), no one from Obsidian even attended that meeting or made a presentation.

But even if Obsidian had made such a public presentation (which it did not), that does not mean that the February 12 meeting was a public meeting. To the contrary, it was held in a private office, with a limited number of attendees. It was not open to the public. In fact, Mr. Padrick made clear from the outset that he did not want anyone to take notes and he even at one point asked for Mr. Vance to leave the room.

And finally, Obsidian never made a presentation on February 12—because it was never provided the opportunity.

Your "Fact" No. 2- False and misleading

You have referred to " Summit " taking certain actions on or around February 11. We are unaware of " Summit " taking such actions—since Summit at that point could only have been acting through Terry Vance. It is our understanding that you—not "Summit"—asked the U.S. Trustee's Office for a meeting with Obsidian so that Obsidian could make a presentation to you and the Summit shareholders. We also understand that on February 11, you asked Judge Dunn if Obsidian could come make the same presentation to you and the shareholders that was made to the creditors' committee. (Of course, the fact that you twice asked to have the presentation made to you only further confirms that you could not have obtained a recording of it, contrary to your statement in "Fact" No. 1. If it had been recorded, you could have simply obtained the recording.) Judge Dunn did not issue any order requiring Obsidian to make a presentation to you or anyone else.

On February 12, Mr. Padrick and other Obsidian staff had a private meeting with the four shareholders, you, your stepmother and Terry Vance. Again, this was not a public meeting. Obsidian had no objection to you and your mother being present since you were direct or indirect beneficiaries of the Inland loans and, as a result, owners of assets that would necessarily become tied up with the estate.

Your "Fact" No. 3- False and misleading


The video camera was not unconcealed—which is confirmed by the fact that Mr. Padrick objected to having notes taken verbatim. If the video camera was in plain sight and recording, it would have made no sense for Mr. Padrick to object to note-taking—since there would be a verbatim recording of the entire meeting. Nor would it have made sense for him to request that Terry Vance leave the room, since Mr. Vance could have simply watched the video later. If the video camera was in plain sight and recording, Mr. Padrick would have obviously objected to it and left the meeting if it was not turned off. Any person who watches the video realizes that immediately. Terry Vance has confirmed that he, like Mr. Padrick and the other Obsidian staff, did not see any operating video camera or other recording device in the room when the meeting took place.

Your "Fact" No. 4- Vague and irrelevant

We do not know who was involved in the making the recording. And we do not know what you mean in saying that the person(s) making the recording were "members of the public." ORS 165.540 does not authorize the otherwise criminal activity simply because someone is a member of the public. It applies to any person who engages in the criminal activity.

Your "Fact" No. 5- Irrelevant

Whether the notes were or were not privileged has nothing to do with whether it is criminal under Oregon law to surreptitiously record an in-person conversation (which it is).

Your "Fact" No. 6- Conclusory

It is not surprising that Mr. Andersen reached the legal conclusion that he did when you asked him to assume that conclusion—namely, that those responsible for making the illegal recording believed in good faith that it was authorized by statute. In any event, no one could have in good faith believed that the recording was made legally. And you certainly could not have relied on Mr. Andersen's June 2 memorandum in good faith when you posted the recording, given that you provided him with incorrect background facts.

The facts are that this was a private meeting in which one or more individuals surreptitiously recorded a conversation. That is a Class A misdemeanor under ORS 165.540. Your posting of the recording is a further Class A misdemeanor under ORS 165.540. We demand that you immediately take down the illegal recording and transcript from any and all websites.

David S. Aman

******
Are Internet Laws Actually Based Out of Oregon? Or is it Virginia? Does this Whistleblower Blog has special privelege ? Does Summit 1031 have a Moral and Legal Obligation to FULLY disclose what is going on? Is the TRUTH really a Class A Misdemeanor... are You Kidding?
R
If Summit 1031 is telling the Truth and so many are trying to Change the Story to benefit them ... then they HAD to record this or it WOULD have OBVIOUSLY been lied about later as to what was Really Said.
R
Class A Misdemeanor In Oregon? What? Oregon is Certainly NOT the only State Affected by this Mess of Lies.
r
Soon We Will Post "Mike Morgan and Goldman Sachs information", information on linking to blogs and stories, and other defamation, intellectual and Huff and Puff attorneys trying to STOP the TRUTH and Losing.
r
Now I know that David Aman is a VERY big Deal in His world, as is Kevin Padrick, HOWEVER, in my World the Real Estate Consumer is a VERY big deal. And nothing should EVER stand in the way of the Real Estate Consumer Getting Justice and All available information.
r
And as Wealthy as these Attorneys, Lumber Barons, Mulit-Millionaires are .. they are NO WAY near as wealthy as Goldman Sachs, and Goldman Sachs lost trying to do this same bullying, suppression of information and silencing and Industry Whistleblower.
r
Where is the Department of Justice in this? Do they not Care? Where is the IRS and those who govern 1031 Exchanges ? Are they absolutely no Checks and Balances or Elements in place to Protect the Real Estate Consumer with a 1031 Exchange? If Not the IRS better had just get rid of them...
r
I kind of Want to Say, Grow A Brain David Aman, what you have done is just riled up the Consumer Advocated, thousands have the video dowloaded already, and if you succeed in "Criminal Charges" against Stephanie DeYoung, and keep pushing to FIGHT the TRUTH getting out.. Thousands of people all over the world will just reload the videos on hundreds of video share sites and thousands of blogs and you will get even more bad press.
r
Had you NOT sent these Threats, You would still be in Control of your search engine presence.
r
My name is Crystal L. Cox and fighting for the Real Estate Consumer EVERY DAY is what I do, if THIS meeting is some SECRET information that Consumer are not to know then I demand to know why. I demand the Department of Justice and the governing bodies of real estate though fairly powerless still they should be asking Why is David Aman and Kevin Padrick Making so Much Noise to Stop these Videos of what REALLY was Said. Consumer DESERVE Full Disclosure, these Real Estate Victims Deserve all Available information.
r
Who would Have the NERVE to Object to Notes being Taken Verbatim.. Well someone with something to hide that is. David Aman has lot of Gibberish and Hullabaloo to lather on to STOP this video from Being Seen by those Who are affected by it most. WHY?
r
Who Will DEMAND that David Arman Cease and Desist his ASSAULT on the Real Estate Victims who DESERVE the TRUTH. The Whole Truth and Nothing But.. VERBATIM.
r R
Why would Mr. Padrick have "Objected" to being recorded and left the meeting. He is PAID big bucks, these people are the clients, Talk about a Rude Power Trip. How does MR. Padrick have the right to object to them taking verbatim notes or recording the meeting? What is this man up to that he will NOT let you in any way REPEAT, Record or even take notes when he Speaks, such a powerfull man.. You would think he would be proud of what he says, stand in his truth in public and in closed meetings and not be so ASHAMED at what he said that he Wants to STOP this video from being Seen.
r
It Really Happened, it is not like Words that Accuse, it is A FACTUAL, PROVEN video of what was Really Said. .. what is the Problem...
r
As you Can Imagine - there will be Much, Much more on this Later..
r

What is this Spat Between Kevin Padrick and Stephanie DeYoung Really About?

I mean this Stephanie Studebaker DeYoung is an unlikely Source to be standing up, somehow for the very consumers her dad's company is said to Have "ripped off". But that is exactly what she is doing. You see it is said that Financial Consultants and Attorneys are Eating up the Money that the Real Estate Consumers Should Be Getting.
r

Tough to Belief Stephanie Studebaker - DeYoung when she is VERY connected to a part owner of Summit 1031 Exchangers, and it is kind of an us against them right.. Consumers that were Trying to do a 1031 Exchange against the Big Bad Summit 1031? The Media, we know they always tell the truth and the whole story, well the Media feels sorry for the Real Estate Consumer, as do I but they are NOT getting down to the Nitty Gritty to Expose where the money is REALLY being tied up at, who or what is holding up Millions upon Millions of Dollars ? What if there is more to the Story and the More is the KEY to you getting your Lif Back?
R
Well there seems to be some sort of Smack Down between Stephanie DeYoung and Kevin Padrick, and Being the Real Estate Industry Whistleblower, I wanted to dig deeper and see if there was anything to all this, if the real estate consumers really need to know, if their was signs of Real Estate Corruption, Real Estate Lies that My Real Estate Consumers ( thats YOU) NEEDED to know and it turns out there is a TON of information that you truly do need to know.
r
Here is What Stephanie has to Say...
R
I have been dealing with a lawyer, Kevin Padrick, who knowingly took advantage of a business, Summit Accommodators, Inc. dba Summit 1031 Exchange, that was having liquidity problems by selling himself and his companies, Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, services to them. He told them his company would help facilitate 1031 exchanges, fund the exchanges, and liquidate the assets for top dollar to earn their high hourly rates and 15% commission.

The shareholders of the company were not familiar with bankruptcy law because their company was not in danger of bankruptcy for the last 15 years. It was only when the real estate market collapsed that they found themselves with a liquidity problem.

They couldn’t get temporary loans, the could liquidate property, they couldn’t get paid back on loans owed to them. However, when they declared bankruptcy, they still had $13.6 Million in the bank account.

Kevin Padrick, Senior Principal of Obsidian Finance Group, LLC, saw the cash in the bank and decided that a few million of the cash should be his. Instead of helping the debtor facilitate the exchanges and liquidate the assets, he and his company did nothing except stall and go to the other side (creditors’ committee) with priviledged information (debtor’s gave him) claiming he had done all the research and somehow convinced them to give him the job as Chief Restructuring Officer.

Originally, this was a bankruptcy that was a debtor in possession with a Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO) in charge of the restructuring efforts.

Obsidian Finance was supposed to be working for the CRO. Obsidian Finance or Padrick did not communicate with the CRO or the debtors. Instead, they communicated with the creditors. All of a sudden, the Court said their needed to be a trustee and Kevin Padrick was appointed as bankruptcy or liquidating trustee.

The CRO had already figured out there was no Ponzi scheme and he was doing his job working with all the parties and liquidating properties. He approved $750K of sales before he was dismissed. Obsidian Finance & Kevin Padrick charged the bankruptcy estate $184K to get their Senior Principal the job of Bankruptcy Trustee.

Then simply by transferring the remaining cash (cash not distributed to creditors) OR $6 Million, Kevin Padrick charged the estate 3% or approximately $1/2 Milllion for a simple bank transfer & money in checking when he got the job. Then Kevin Padrick hired legal counsel, Tonkon Torp, to harass innocent people until they run out of money and energy and give up their interest in properties where they put their hard earned money in and have every right to still own that interest.

Tonkon Torp is charging the estate $270K of which most is for services that bring no benefit to the creditors, but hike up their hours and legal fees earned. The more time they waste, the more money they are able to charge. Total charges between these 3 entities is almost $1 Million in just 5 months. The only amount of money they have brought into the estate is $10K.
Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. Section 330 of the United States Chapter 11 bankruptcy code, (3) in determining the amount of reasonable compensation to be awarded to a Trustee or professional person, the Court shall consider the nature, the extent, and the value of such services, taking into account all relevant factors, including…

(A) time spent on such services (Who gets paid $184K to land a job)(B) the rates charged for such services (Kevin Padrick’s rate is $600/hour and all he does for the hourly rate is waste time, allege things without proof, and harass innocent people until they throw up their hands and give them their property)

(C) whether the services were necessary to the administration of, or beneficial at the time at when the service was rendered. (Who gets $164K to transfer money from one bank account to another???? The remaining is simply 3% of what was in the Summit 1031’s bank account when Kevin Padrick took over the job as Trustee)

(D) whether the services were performed within a reasonable amount of time commensurate with the complexity, importance, and nature of the problem, issue, or task addressed (Kevin Padrick makes it look like it is more complex than it is, he does nothing to make things move quickly, he ignores and loses offers on properties ($900K worth so far), and he has caused the majority of the delays in this case)

(E) with respect to a professional person, whether the person is board certified (Kevin Padrick is an attorney so he does fit this part of the code)

(F) whether the compensation is reasonable based on the customary compensation charged by comparably skilled practitioners (The attorneys are trying to finish the 1031 exchanges and the estate is paying for their learning curve…The attorneys have charged $125K more than a Qualified Intermediary would charge for the same work)

(4) (A) The Court shall not allow compensation for…
(i) unnecessary duplication of services (I identified almost 200K is for duplication of services)(ii) (I) services that are not reasonably likely to benefit the debtor’s estate (Kevin Padrick knows this is not a Ponzi scheme and there was not any Embezzlement, but he is trying to use this to drum up claims against innocent third parties.

The fees that have been charged to go after innocent third parties is $111K. By the time everyone figures out there was no Ponzi Scheme or Embezzlement, Kevin Padrick will be $6Million dollars richer and on his way to benefit from someone else’s misfortune. He has only netted the estate $3K, but has charged the estate almost $1Million.

How is this benefitting the creditors? It seems that it is mostly profitable to Kevin Padrick, Obsidian, and Tonkon Torp for providing absolutely no value to the estate)(ii)(II) necessary to the administration of the cased (This if for the Court and/or US Trustees Office to determine)
On 7/2/09, I filed an objection to these fees. To view this objection, go to http://www.Summit1031BKjustice.com/?page_id=1196 .

There is also a taping of Kevin Padrick & Obsidian Finance’s presentation to interested parties and shareholders included on this site at http://www.summit1031bkjustice.com/?page_id=254 . At this presentation Kevin Padrick does not want us to take notes, does not tell us who sent him to the creditors’ committee, and does not tell us how he is going to bring value to the estate. From this presentation, it is difficult to tell what type of professional competence would warrant costing the estate $1 Million in Attorney and Professional Fees."
R

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

NAR president on CNBC, 2/11/08 - NAR Lied and The are NOT accountable in ANY way.. no ONE Cares

Richard Gaylord is Lying in this Video and No one can do anything about it. NAR is Not held to the Higher Standard that they brag they are all about. NAR Should be held accountable for this dispicable Propaganda but they are not. And in fact though they Convinced you to Get deeper into debt, though they have not Quality control over MLS data and do NOT hold Realtor, NAR members accountable for the damage they do for real estate consumers .. well NOW they are advising your Government on What Next, to Save You the Real Estate Consumer, and because NAR is a Billion Dollar Entity - your Government listens to their Advice, Clout, Pressure and Flat Out Lies.

The Video below Should NEVER be Forgotten and Should Never Be forgiven. NAR got you the Real Estate Consumer into this Mess and not enough People are point the Finger at the NAR president and the National Association of Realtors. I saw this stuff first hand and you, the Real Estate Victim (Real Estates Consumer) - you have been Duped ~ and now NAR is "working with Congress" as the New NAR president Charles McMillan prepares for more LIES forced on the Real Estate Consumer to come to YOUR aid when they are the PROBLEM in the First Place.

NAR is lying and where does it End? Big Money and Big Politics will keep NAR forced into your Real Estate Transactions and you can do nothing about it, Seemingly.



Buy - Buy - Buy ... Lies .. Lies.. Lies.. Higher Loan Limits, this is GOOD for BUYERS.. no way, prices were to high, loans were forced and NAR was pushing buyers and they want you to still use a "REALTOR" NAR member to sell your distressed home.

This stuff is Sick and VERY wrong and should never be forgotten. NEVER - Ever Forget the lies told by the National Association of Realtors that took Real Estate Consumers Down.. RealEstateIndustryWhistleblower.com - Crystal L. Cox - Real Estate Consumer Advocate.

If they are having trouble with loans - they can refinance - so another words, false equity, false debt that should not be on the consumer and PUSHED by Liars at NAR.. do NOT believe the Realtors Association and Never Trust them.. EVER..

The Reporter Questions and the LIES just keep rolling.. You were deceived by NAR…. Don’t forget it..

The president of NAR Said, with low interest rate and lots of inventory it is time to buy. How can this guy sleep at night.. Prices are Leveling off he said, What a Clueless Ass. NAR knew, they lied to the real estate consumer made billions from those lies and now they are set to make billions more as you Lose everything and they get their hands in that.. Higher LOAN Limits Save from Foreclosure, those are OUR Statistics from OUR Research Department.. Holy Cow.. NAR is Clueless or Did they really know and simply let you keep lining their pockets til’ the crash was obvious. Hmmm…

30 Years in the Business.. WoW..
r
He sure has done a lot of Damage.. And NO accountability from NAR to the Real Estate Consumer across the board.

And now the Current NAR President, Charles Mcmillan is working with Congress to get you back into these same types of messes.. NAR is NOT the voice of Real Estate.
r
NAR Lies and cheats the Consumer in every way imaginable…

Stop Using NAR members and DO NOT forget this Deception.
NAR does not Hold Realtors Accountable for Lying to YOU.

and NO ONE holds the National Association of Realtors accountable for Flat Out Lies such as in this Video. You MUST demand that NAR be Held Accountable for Lying to You. STOP using NAR members, Realtors. Write to all the Politicians you can and tell them how you feel. Talk to the Department of Justice. NAR has more money then any of the Government Entitites that are supposedly set up to protect you. And NAR lobbying and Clout will win to GET their Way so they get Richer... and NAR is Using your Money to Do it. And of course other "Lobby Dollars" , "Political Pull" and "Clout".

Here is the Secret Weapon, IF you the Real Estate Consumer, the Real Estate Victims Speak out about Realtors, NAR and you Stop letting them do this to you, then little by little the EMPIRE, the Cartel will come down and you the Real Estate Consumer will have a chance. For now, their billions are stomping on you daily and you don't even know it.. and odds are your local Realtor does not know either, they just play follow the leader, don't ask questions and Get my Paycheck..

TIME to HOLD the National Association of Realtors Accountable for Bad Advice, Flat Out Lies, not holding their members to a true higher standard, having no Elements in place for quality control and taking advantage of the Real Estate Consumer in ways that change their life for the worse and forever.

When Do Consumers Say NO... to NAR

Take Back your Rights in Real Estate.

Crystal L. Cox
Real Estate Consumer Advocate
Real Estate Whistleblower.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

the Great Real Estate Illusion Facilitated By NAR - the National Association of Realtors

Stay tuned for much more on this blog about the Real Estate Illusion that the National Association of Realtors is bringing to you, along with their Billionair Cronies.

for Now Check out